The
Myth of Inborn Homosexuality
The
debate over the causes of homosexuality, like the debates
of the causes of other forms of behavior may never be
resolved. Why I do what I do, and whether or not I could
do differently are at their basis philosophical or theological
issues, seldom subject to scientific analysis. Human
beings are complex; we cannot put them in test tubes
and experiment with them in ways that will prove our
theories.
Still,
due to constant repetition by those who desperately
want to believe that there is a genetic cause for homosexuality,
many believe that the proof of genetic causes is already
in and is widely accepted in the scientific community.
This is absolutely false. Every year new studies come
forth that purport to show a pre-natal cause for homosexuality.
In recent years we have had the hypothalamus study (LeVay),
the twin study (Bailey and Pillard) and the chromosome
study (Hamer-NIH). Each of these widely publicized studies,
and those that have gone before them, have made a one-time
splash in the media. None of them has been replicated
by subsequent research. Interestingly each of these
studies has been conducted by a gay researcher. The
sexual orientation of the researcher certainly does
not invalidate the study, but the question arises: Why
have the 97% of the scientists who are heterosexual
never replicated one of these studies. Furthermore,
most of these studies have been shown to be seriously
flawed, and in the case of the twin study, a later English
study came up with very different results.2
Quite
likely, homosexuality comes about from a number of causes.
Inborn characteristics, choices we make,* and developmental
issues all may contribute. The destructive myth, however,
is that we have proven that homosexuality is written
into our genetic code and therefore is unchangeable.
That brings us to our next myth.
A
study published in Pediatrics magazine in 1992 3
revealed that 26% of children aged 12 are uncertain
of their sexuality. This figure declines to 5% by age
17, with an average unsure for all age groups of 10.7%.
As gay and lesbian persons make up less than 3% of our
population, the great majority of these children - barring
specific contrary influences - will turn our to be heterosexual
in their orientation. At an early age, our sexuality
is quite fluid.
Despite
that 1973 deletion of homosexuality as a disorder in
the American Psychiatric Association's DSM III, many
professional therapists continue to treat homosexually
oriented people who want to change and find excellent
results. Masters & Johnson reported a 71.6% success
rate after a 6-year follow up. Mayerson & Lief experienced
a 47% success rate with a follow-up of 4 years. Gerard
van
* No knowledgeable person claims that an individual
consciously and intentionally chooses to be homosexual.
However, in retrospect many of us have seen how choices
we made in how we would respond to the world around
us have contributed to the development of our homosexuality.
Gerard
van den Aardveg found that among 101 clients, 65% experienced
either a “radical” or “satisfactory” change.4
In over 150 Christian ministries like Regeneration
around the world thousands of men and women who are
unhappy with their homosexuality are experiencing major
changes in their behavior, in their identity and in
their sexual attractions. Any honest and serious consideration
of homosexuality would involve a serious investigation
into the claims of these groups. Sadly, such investigations
are seldom made, particularly by the people in the church
who are already predisposed to accept homosexuality.
The Myth of New Understanding and Knowledge
Those
who advocate the acceptance of homosexuality often speak
vaguely of new information, or a new understanding that
should cause us to re-think our attitudes toward homosexuality.
I challenge them to explain to us what this new understanding
is. Except for the concept of the “constitutionally
homosexual person” — for which there is absolutely no
proof, I have never heard what this new understanding
or knowledge is. Have you?
|